Hello all,
I restarted SAP system, as mentioned on this post, and it worked.
Regards,
Hello all,
I restarted SAP system, as mentioned on this post, and it worked.
Regards,
Hello All,
I am getting below issue after Generate the code of PI service/interface in CAF dc in NWDI.
Invalid name: appropriate prefix not found; choose another name or another name server
Created CAF DC in existing Software Component.
Imported PI Service from ESR (Import - Create WebService Provider). PI interface structure has been generated in CAF DC
Now using Generate option I have generated CAF generated classes, but I am getting Invalid Name issue.
After that Generated classes are generated and also properly Activated the code.
Error Log Details
Can you please help me about this issue?
Regards,
Rami Reddy
Hello Rami,
Please check out the steps in this note: 1816503 - NWDS not identifying Vendor/Name Prefix defined in SLD.
Best Regards,
Peter
I am trying to learn ABAP in the context of the SAP PM module and the trial install and MaxDB do not have a logistics section or an enterprise structure when using Tcode SPRO... Can anyone tell me how I get one to experiment with?
Shane
Hello Experts,
on our ERP-System I see a job running for a long time. The report is CL_SQL_C (ddic).
Can anybody can tell my what this job is doing? Is it normal that it's running for more than 11.000 seconds?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Martin
Dear SAP Experts,
I have problem with setup RFC SERVER_EXEC on explicit host. I have ECC system with several application servers.
RFCSDK was installed in all application server. By default activation type is "Start on Application Server". All application server can access this RFC using connection test.
The problem is we have requirement to run this RFC only in one of application server (let say app2). I have tried change the activation type to "Start on Explicit Host" and mention app2 as target host.
When i tried to test the connection, error message appeared like below:
SMGW:
Is there any thing that i missed to enable this RFC? Please help give me suggestion to solve this error.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Husin
Hi Husin,
Please check if the rfcexec really exist in app2 target host.
if really exist, please try to specify the full path of the rfcexec in the RFC destination and try again.
Best regards,
SF
Good morning all, I have installed a SAP NetWeaver Version 750 on Windows Server 2012 R2. Now I want to install BI_CONT 757 and the recommended restrictions like SAP Note 1943931 is to install the PI_BASIS 750. But I can't find the download. Can anyone help? Thanks in advance
Hello together,
gkralik is currently working on a PHP7 extension for the NW RFC library.
https://github.com/gkralik/php7-sapnwrfc
My quesion is, if it's allowed to make the NW RFC library public available here
http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/deps/
If that would be allowed, it would be possible to publish the extension on PECL (the official PHP extension site)
The NW RFC library is needed for that, since PECL provides also Windows builds.
This would have the benefit that the SAP NW RFC gets a "first class" citizen in PHP on Unix and Windows.
Maybe we could reduce the files to the only needed ones (if that helps to get the files on that server)
- some header files
- and sapnwrfc.lib + libsapucum.lib
Thanks in advance, for answering (hopefully positivie) my question.
Best regards
Martin
Hi Husin,
it seems that rfcexec can be run from the command line without errors.
please also check:
-run a connection test on the app2 from SM59 on SERVER_EXEC
-check if there are any incompatible rfcexec.sec files on app2
(For example, remove (rename) the rfcexec.sec in the home folder of the <sid>adm user)
Thanks and best regards,
Shi Feng
Hi Shi Feng,
Thanks for your help.
when i set as explicit host to app2, the connection test is ok in app2, but in other servers is failed.
I have deleted all rfcexec.sec in home folder of sidadm user and home folder in SAP, but last time the RFC was not worked.
Its a good news. The issue is solved now.
The solution is add gateway parameter in RFC setting.
Quite strange i have tried this yesterday but the result still error, but when i tried the same thing today, the RFC is work now.
Thanks & best regards,
Husin
Hi Peter,
Thanks for reply,
1) Yes it was for SP001 patch 0002 ?
2) SP uses for developers team and it is not critical do not apply the highest SP?
I mean I can apply to my SP001 to last patch 0002 or upgrade to last SP for example SP003 and it will be same in terms of safety ?
Hi Alex,
This particular fix was provided for the SP levels we can see in the list (SP0-1-2-3). Obviously latter SP levels (SP4, etc) will also have this fix.
SP0 and SP1 has to be patched in order to have the patch. (SP2 and SP3 have it by default, with patch level 0)
It is always easier to update the patch levels only. That involves the deployment of only a few components. The SP upgrade involves deployment of all components, because the SP levels must be the same in a given stack.
If you have SP1 now, the easiest solution is to deploy the latest patch level of the corresponding components.
Best Regards,
Peter
Hi Peter,
Thanks for reply!
Hi Husin,
Thank you for sharing the solution.
Since the issue has been solved, please mark this thread as "answered".
Thanks and best regards,
Shi Feng
Hi All,
The systems in landscape are based on Kernel 721_ext 600 patch. Web disp version is 720. We would like to upgrade to web disp 745. I believe as per note 908097, web disp 745 is downward compatible. OS is Linux 6. please can someone confirm if we can use latest 745 or 742 web disp.
Thanks,
Ranjith
Hi Isaias,
Thanks for the timely response.
Yes the EXT I am refereeing to is EXTSRV argument; yes the user would access the EXT site through the web dispatcher and www.abcd.com is an address that points to the web dispatcher server.
Kaushik G
Hello Kaushik,
If www.abcd.com will be used exclusively when the users want to access the EXT site, you could use the SRCSRV or SRCVHOST arguments of the wdisp/system_X parameter as the selection criteria.
Chekc out:
Regards,
Isaías
Hello,
We are
running SAP S/4 Hana on premise (Netweaver 7.50 )1511 SP00 and are patching the system to SAP S/4 Hana 1511 SP01
We are using Software Update Manager 1.0 SP 15
=== Type: error === Source: PREP_GENCHECKS/CHECK4NOTES_PACKAGES === Title:
Missing Notes ===
The SAP Notes listed below contain corrections that are essential for a correct
procedure. You can only continue with the procedure after you have implemented
the SAP Notes or the specified Support Packages
the Note
Assistant to download the following SAP Notes and implement them if
applicable.
In this system, you can ignore notes that are classified as "can not be
implemented" or "obsolete" by the Note Assistant . However, we
recommended to
transport these inapplicable SAP Notes and the implemented SAP Notes into the
system landscape. If you do not transport the inapplicable SAP Notes too, the
SUM execution in the follow-up systems will stop in this phase because these
SAP
Notes are not at the latest level.
Use report SCWN_TRANSPORT_NOTES as described in SAP Note 1788379 to transport
the SAP Notes.
If you prefer to import the corrections using Support Packages, reset the
procedure and import the specified Support Packages in a separate queue using
the Support Package Manager.
ABAP Patch |Note |Support package
====================================================
SAPK-75001INSAPBASIS|0002257142|SAPK-75002INSAPBASIS
----------------------------------------------------
SAPK-75001INSAPBASIS|0002257143|SAPK-75002INSAPBASIS
----------------------------------------------------
SAPK-75001INSAPBASIS|0002275092|SAPK-75002INSAPBASIS
----------------------------------------------------
SAPK-10001INS4CORE |0002257142|SAPK-75002INSAPBASIS
---------------------------------------------------
SAPK-10001INS4CORE |0002257143|SAPK-75002INSAPBASIS
----------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
============
======
=== Type: info === Source: PREP_GENCHECKS/REQ_FRONTREQ_PRE === Title: Update
front end software ===
*INFO* : The front end software could be updated at any time before or during
the upgrade. It must be updated before the start of the shadow instance in
phase
*START_SHDI_FIRST* .
Refer to the upgrade manual if you do not know how to perform the update
procedure.
No missing sap note is being displayed in the log However, We followed instructions provided by sap note 2255834
- SUM prompts for Notes with status "Cannot be implemented" during the phase PREP_GENCHECKS/CHECK4NOTES_PACKAGES
We applied the sap note highlighted in RED :
The status of the iplemented notes has been set to "Completely Implemented"
Still, no matter what we do, we are still getting the same error and are unable to proceed
with the upgrade . I stopped HANA , stopped S/4 Hana, , it didnt help.
Thank you for your attention.
Silly me, I didt not apply the mentionned notes ...